Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Women on Shakespeare: Joey Parsons as Titania, Hermia, and others

Since most Shakespearean casts are male-heavy (and some are male-only), show coverage tends to focus on men who create the work. Let's balance that out! I'm starting a new interview series on The Fifth Wall, talking with the women who produce and perform Shakespeare and related work.

For the inaugural entry, I emailed with Joey Parsons. She's a member of the Pearl Theater's acting company, one of the few NYC companies to remount classics like Shak and Shaw. This fall, Ms. Parsons is part of the five-actor ensemble in A Midsummer Night's Dream, a phenomenally inventive production directed by Eric Tucker.

Which roles do you play in this five-actor Midsummer?

I play Hermia, Titania, and Snout, with a smattering of Hippolyta and a few of Demetrius’ lines.

How do you manage all the shifts from role to role?

In terms of actorly techniques, I prepare differently for each production I'm fortunate enough to work in. For this Midsummer, I put a lot of thought into physicality. I was trained in ballet and several other dance techniques, and I find that thinking about how a character moves or stands really helps me. I tried to find one gesture for each character. Nothing too crazy, just a little physical thing to put me in that body. Hermia felt most like me, so her voice is my voice. Snout is a little more innocent and in love with Bottom (the way I’m playing her), so I found her voice to be a bit higher than my normal range. Titania feels of-the-elements to me, so I naturally put a bit more gravitas into her speech.

What sort of approach did Eric Tucker bring to rehearsals?

Eric was enormously collaborative and was always open to suggestions. In fact we had a half-joke amongst the cast to be careful what we would joke about in front of Eric because he would always say “Yes! Try that!” The fantastic way we end our production, with Puck getting smashed by Bottom, was actually a joke that Mark Bedard made during a break that Eric overheard!

Of course only five of us are playing all the characters, but I (and the audience, I hope) started to see how all of these story lines intersect and weave together. I used to see Midsummer as essentially three separate stories, but we’ve woven them all together in a fascinating way.

Did the rehearsals help you discover anything new about Shakespeare in general?

I’m remembering a wonderful interview with Mark Rylance in which he called for more irreverence in Shakespeare. I saw his marvelous Twelfth Night on Broadway, and couldn’t wait to work on some Shakespeare again so that I could try it in a looser, more playful way. The whole rehearsal process for Midsummer was about play. And so is the performing of it. If I’m not having a good time on stage, for whatever reason, it's because I am thinking too much and not playing enough. It’s like a wonderful meditation. I have to work at remaining present and playful.


Have you been in Midsummer before?

I’ve seen many productions of Midsummer, but I’ve never been in one before. It’s always been a bit of a cursed audition for me, because I’ve never been 'enough of', or I’ve been 'too much of', what they were looking for. I’ve always been told I’m too tall for Hermia, not tall enough for Helena, and not old enough for Titania. Years ago, I auditioned for a production where the director had asked me to prepare Helena. He clearly liked what I brought to the audition, but he thought I was too dark and short. So he asked me to take a few minutes and prepare Hermia. I did. He liked that, but declared me just not right for that either. He had me then prepare Titania: also just not quite right. And then after Titania, Puck! I didn’t book anything in that production! That director went on to cast me in several productions, so no hard feelings!

What about Midsummers you've seen? Have they influenced how you think about the play?

Most productions I’ve seen felt stodgy to me, and the three story lines were very, very separate. But I did see one production, years ago at Hudson Valley Shakespeare Festival, which was set in space. Yes, space. It was kooky and playful, and was one of the first times I thought that it was actually awesome to not take Shakespeare so damn seriously.

Do you think training is necessary to perform Shakespeare?

We did a lot of Shakespeare work at Yale School of Drama. I did countless hours of text analysis and voice work on any given class assignment or production. I’m grateful for what I learned there, but I do have to say that I got way too in-my-head about it for many years. I convinced myself that there was a 'right' way to do Shakespeare, and that if I wasn’t doing hours and hours of text work, underlining all the antithesis, and pause breaks and breath breaks with all my different-colored pens, I wasn’t doing my job and I wasn’t a good actor.

This is not me criticizing my education or Shakespeare study in general. My experience is part of my inherent personality; I always want to get things right. And it was a good lesson for me in that there is no right. There is only clear communication. Whatever that means for an actor and a director. For years, I was concerned with correct inflection, not illuminated communication. That is my goal now.

How do you prepare now?

I do still like to underline, and I like trying to get the iambic pentameter correct. Although, at one point in this Midsummer production, Eric asked me to not do it 'correctly' on one of my lines because it sounded too stodgy and pulled the audience out of the story, and into the text. I totally got where he was coming from.

I have to say that most of my favorite 'Shakespearean' actors have not done extensive Shakespeare study. They simply try to make the text sound sensical. I auditioned for a lot of Shakespeare out of grad school, and didn’t book any for years. Then one day, I decided to treat my audition as an experiment, and I decided to do the opposite of everything I’d been taught. I booked that job!


Do you have any particular Shakespearean roles you’d love to perform?

I’ve been so fortunate to play some lovely ones: Rosalind, Lady Anne, Ariel, and many others. I always wanted a crack at Juliet, but as the late, great Mark Rucker once said to me: “Honey, you’d better get on that soon!” Perhaps someday Eric Tucker will direct a version of Romeo and Juliet, and as he loves non-traditional, gender-swapping, age-ignoring casting, I’d maybe get a crack at it! Lady Macbeth, Constance in King John, Beatrice, Kate in Shrew, Cleopatra, and oddly enough, Queen Katherine in Henry VIII. It’s a play that is hardly ever done, mostly for good reason, but her courtroom speech is astounding, and one that I often did for auditions early on in my career when they “just wanted to see a little Shakespeare.” I think directors who would ask me for a Shakespearean monologue always thought I was about to pull out some Ophelia, but then I’d launch into Queen Katherine. It always slightly shook them!

Any dream-roles traditionally played by men?

I never really thought much about men’s roles! But now that I think of it: Iago.

Shakespeare’s plays have some—let’s say ‘problematic’ roles for modern women. Do you try to reconcile his 16th-century depictions of women with your 21st-century views?

Great question. We spoke in rehearsal about how in Midsummer and in fact in most of Shakespeare’s plays, once a resolution of sorts has occurred, the women are rarely heard from again. In Midsummer, Hermia and Helena are onstage, but not heard from again (except in this production!).

I always found this perplexing. I played Isabella in Measure for Measure years ago, and I just couldn’t get over the fact that she never answers the Duke’s proposal in the end. She’s not heard from at all! A lot of productions have clever ways of solving this problem so that it seems like less of a problem. In the production I did, Juliet went into labor at the moment of the proposal and interrupted Isabella’s answer.

In Midsummer rehearsals, we spoke about how we didn’t think it was an oversight that most of the women are not heard from again, but a clear comment on what was 'expected' from married (and engaged) women in Shakespeare’s day and age.

What about how, in Midsummerhe gets comedic mileage from pairing a queen off with a monster?

In terms of Titania being paired off with a donkey, well, yes, I would find that 'joke' very hard to forgive. But technically, Titania doesn’t know yet that it was Oberon who played this trick on her. She may have an idea. But all she knows is that Oberon has awoken her from what she thought was a bad dream, she is beside a donkey, and a pair of lovers, and she is baffled as to what has actually transpired. The last interaction the audience sees between her and Oberon is this:

Come my lord, and in our flight
Tell me how it came this night
That I sleeping here was found
With these mortals on the ground.

The audience does not see the offstage fury that may ensue. I’ve been playing this line as though this is where I’m starting to suspect that Oberon may have had a hand in this. But then the scene ends. I’ve also decided to believe the standpoint that I love Oberon with the fire of a thousand suns, and that my passion and love and desire for him at that moment of forgiveness would trump any anger I had toward him.

Midsummer also has a pair of girls who are deliberately generic (to be fair, so are the boys). As an actor, how do you make these two roles into full-dimensioned women?

I find this so fascinating! I never thought of the girls as generic! Perhaps this is because of my audition experience—that I was always 'too much' or 'not enough' of what directors wanted. Helena wants a love that is not reciprocated. Hermia wants a love that is reciprocated, but is forbidden. The women’s varying physical traits are commented on several times within the play. Helena could be seen as a doormat or a stalker, but I find her determined and active. She is not passive. She knows her love is true, and after all, she was engaged to Demetrius before the play begins.

We joked in rehearsal how in previous viewings and readings of the play, we’ve all always confused the two men! In this production, the wonderful actors playing these parts have done a spectacular job of differentiating them and giving each one a special something. But in most productions, I must admit, I forget who is who, and whom is really in love with whom. Which, now that I think of it, in a really meta way, was perhaps Shakespeare’s intention all along. To create that sort of mild confusion that comes hand in hand with falling in love, before the real confusion even begins.




-----

The Pearl Theater's Midsummer Night's Dream runs from Sep 8 to Nov 1 at 555 W. 42nd Street.

photos: Russ Rowland

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Shakespeare in New York: Autumn 2015 (part 2)

Last week I mentioned the dozen full productions of Shakespeare and related work in NYC. But that's not the extent of NYC's Shakesphere, which should also include readings, operas, and movies. And not to snub the good work Off- and Off-Off-Broadway, but NYC's most high-profile stagings this autumn are actually onscreen. First off, the Cumberbatch Hamlet will be transmitted live from London in October. Other broadcasts from the National Theatre and the RSC also pepper art-house cinemas all fall (I'm only listing the live ones, but you can catch re-airings too).

But the culmination of this autumn season is a legit-film version of Macbeth, starring Michael Fassbender and Marion Cotillard. Here's a taste, courtesy the Guardian:




Locally, the Red Bull begins a new season of Revelation Readings, a crash course in Jacobean theater. I can't overstate how important the Red Bull is to New York's theater scene. Expanding the canon of classics, Red Bull mounts the plays that get overshadowed by Shak's titanic stature. AD Jesse Berger supplements his (invariably superb) stagings with a semi-monthly reading series. The first, The Man of Mode, is also a fundraiser for their upcoming Changeling. Though unaffiliated with the Red Bull, I urge you to contribute—even if you can't attend on Oct 26!

In the meantime here's the non-legit listings for NYC's Shakesphere: opera, film, and readings. Or my best effort at a complete listing, anyway. Also visit the Shakespeare Society for a listing of talkbacks to supplement all the shows in town! 
-----
Otello
Metropolitan Opera
Sep 21-May 6
Verdi's intense and dramatic version of the Moor gets an acclaimed new staging—now without blackface!
-----
Ran
NY Film Festival
Oct 2
Catch one of the greatest film adaptations of Shak, Kurosawa's samurai Lear

-----
Hamlet
National Theatre Live
Oct 15
Everyone's favorite Cumberbatch plays Hamlet in London while you watch him in Manhattan!
Live theater in letterbox!
Cumberbatch as the melancholy Dane
-----
The Man of Mode
The Red Bull at Playwrights Horizons
Oct 26
A reading/fundraiser for the vital Red Bull theater; the play's a Restoration comedy, with Michael Urie (Buyer & Cellar) as the quintessential fop, Sir Fopling Flutter
-----
Public Forum: An Evening with Cleopatra
Joe's Pub at the Public
Nov 16
Christine Baranski plays the Queen of the Nile in an inquiry with takes by Shakespeare & Shaw
-----
The Malcontent
Revel. Reading at the Lortel
Nov 16
This Jacobean tragedy, an early response to Hamlet, is caustic as battery acid
-----
The Winter's Tale
Branagh Co. Live
Nov 26
Branagh transmits his staging from the West End, playing Leontes to Judi Dench's Paulina. NYC location TBD
Dame Dench bundles up as Paulina
for Branagh's Winter's Tale
-----
The Atheist's Tragedy
Revel. Reading at the Lortel
Dec 7
This Jacobean drama has an atypically moral worldview, but it still brings the corruption, rape, & gore
-----
Macbeth
limited release
Dec 4
Director Kurzel (Snowtown) earned acclaim at Cannes for his period take on the Scottish play, while Fassbender & Cotillard are v. good film actors & popular to boot
-----
Every Man in His Humour
Revel. Reading at the Lortel
Dec 28
Ben Jonson populates an urban comedy with an aristo, a merchant's daughter, and half a dozen clowns
-----

Friday, September 18, 2015

Shakespeare in New York: Autumn 2015 (part 1)

The autumn season has plenty of good theater to see. Putting aside Shakespeare for a sec, I'm most excited about Lazarus at NYTW. It's a musical version of The Man Who Fell to Earth, a '60s sci-fi novel about the fall of an alien messiah. The deeply weird '70s movie starred David Bowie, who's also behind the NYTW version in November.

In the Shakes-sphere this fall, there's no major stage productions but plenty to see in New York. Off-Broadway the talented Eric Tucker (of Bedlam) directs a quintet of actors in his protean fashion for Midsummer Night's Dream. Also highly anticipated: These Paper Bullets, a mod musical adaptation of Much Ado, with Billie Joe Armstrong (of Green Day) doing a Beatles pastiche. Rounding out my top picks is The Changeling, a rare Jacobean tragedy from the Red Bull.
Shakespeare meets the Beatles
in These Paper Bullets at the Atlantic
So below I've put together a listing of what NYC's stages will offer in the way of Shakespearean theater. There's so much, next week I'll post a separate list for films (Macbeth with Fassbender & Cotillard), transmissions of London stagings (e.g. the Cumberbatch Hamlet on Oct 15), and local readings (e.g. Red Bull's essential Revelation Readings). In the meantime, here's what's onstage:


-----
Rattlestick Playwrights Th.
thru Oct 5
An actor lures his birth mother, an alcoholic ex-actress, into a psychodrama involving a phony staging of Shakespeare's tragedy
-----
The Drilling Co. (in Bryant Park)
thru Sep 20
If you find yourself in Bryant Park one evening this September, check in with Kate and Petruchio
-----
A Midsummer Night's Dream
Pearl Th.
thru Oct 31
Eric Tucker, the mastermind of Bedlam, casts five actors to play Puck and company


The cast of the Pearl's Midsummer
-----
Richard III
Nicu's Spoon (at the Secret Th.)
Sep 29 - Oct 11
In this radically inclusive staging, the only actor without a physical disability will play Richard Crookback
-----
Makbet
Sure We Can Redemption Center
Oct 1-18
A La Mama-style staging (v. gypsy-inflected) of Macbeth at a site-specific venue in Bushwick
-----
texts&beheadings/ElizabethR
BAM Next Wave
Oct 21-24
A modernist portrait of Q. Bess using a collage of her public & private writing

-----
A Midsummer Night's Dream
New Victory Th.
Oct 30 - Nov 8
Benjamin Britten's opera gets adapted further by a Cape Town ensemble, who score it to marimbas and djembes
-----
All's Well That Ends Well
Mobile Shak Unit (Public Th.)
Nov 2015
Shak's minor tragicomedy tours the boroughs in Oct, then settles into a short run at the Public
Atlantic Th.
Nov 20 – Jan 16
A musical based on Much Ado and A Hard Day's Night (!), with music by Green Day's Billie Joe Armstrong (?!)
-----
H2O
59E59
Nov 27 - Dec 13
A fictional Hollywood man-of-the-moment meets his match as Hamlet on B'way, by pseudonymous playwright Jane Martin
-----
The Changeling
Red Bull Th. (at the Lortel)
Dec 26 - Jan 24
An excellent Jacobean play eclipsed by Shak. This noirish tragedy has a lady and her servant/lover kill their lord; it includes a visit to Bedlam Asylum!

-----
-----
ONGOING
-----

Something Rotten
Broadway (St. James Th.)
ongoing

Christian Borle's Shakespeare is a rock-musical god
in Something Rotten
Not a movie! Not a novel! This fluffy musical comedy is notable mainly for actually being entirely original. Rotten imagines a pair of Elizabethan playwrights who anachronistically invent musical theater to compete with Will Shakespeare. Christian Borle plays that role as a swelled-head rockstar in tight leather and large codpiece; Brian d’Arcy James is his everyman opposite. They're forced to carry the show, a forgettable entry in the shticky sub-genre of musicals-about-musicals (e.g. The ProducersSpamalot). From the POV of a Shakespeare nut, Rotten is especially disappointing. The act 1 number "God, I Hate Shakespeare" wastes itself on lame potshots like 'he makes the audience feel dumb' and 'his plays are too long' instead of legit gripes like overcomplicated plots, unfunny clowns, and the ridiculous sight of epic battles on intimate stages.



-----
-----
NEXT SPRING
-----
Classic Stage Co.
Mar 2016
F. Murray Abraham plays a Jew; the play's a 18th-c. German response to Shylock


Classic Stage Co.
Mar 2016
CSC partners with Columbia Drama's grad students to stage Shak for younger audiences

RSC at BAM
Mar 24 - May 1, 2016
David Tennant is the matinee draw as Richard 2, with Antony Sher's Falstaff as ballast

Romeo and Juliet

Mobile Shak Unit (Public Th)
May 2016
The MSU stages one of drama's most familiar tragedies for the outer boroughs & the Public
-----
-----
PHOTO CREDITS

These Paper Bullets — Michael Lamont
A Midsummer Night's Dream — T. Charles Erickson
Something Rotten — Joan Marcus

Friday, September 11, 2015

Shakespeare's Refugees

Organized labor didn't have a fan in Shakespeare. Most of his depictions of the urban working class involve riots. Londoners in Henry 6.2 ("Kill all the lawyers!") and Romans in Coriolanus go nuts in the streets till disorder is quelled. And in J. Caesar, Antony's funeral speech incites a mob to kill a poet just for sharing names with a conspirator.

Anyway, last weekend my mind wasn't on labor either (hence a Friday post). I spent more thought on the refugee crisis in Europe, another subject you wouldn't look to Shakespeare for. Surprise! He did write a scene that addresses the crisis beautifully.

Some background: popular scholarship says our guy wrote a few scenes for The Book of Sir Thomas More, a play (despite the title) about the great English humanist. And that 'wrote' is literal. Five 'hands' composed the manuscript, and scholars are pretty sure that 'Hand D' is Shak's.

As an in-house writer, one of Shakespeare's jobs was to write (or rewrite) pivotal scenes for plays that his company owned the rights to. In Thomas More, he gets the scene where Sir Thomas defuses a 1517 riot against foreigners in London (AKA Evil May Day). Here's the big Act Two speech:

Grant them removed, and grant that this your noise
Hath chid down all the majesty of England;
Imagine that you see the wretched strangers,
Their babies at their backs and their poor luggage,
Plodding to the ports and coasts for transportation,
And that you sit as kings in your desires,
Authority quite silent by your brawl,
And you in ruff of your opinions clothed;
What had you got?

Aren't lines 3-5 vivid? Anyway, here the mob wants to deport the immigrants. By rioting, they usurp the king's authority. So their demands would set a dangerous precedent:

What had you got? I'll tell you: you had taught
How insolence and strong hand should prevail,
How order should be quelled; and by this pattern
Not one of you should live an aged man,
For other ruffians, as their fancies wrought,
With self same hand, self reasons, and self right,
Would shark on you, and men like ravenous fishes
Would feed on one another.

Shak argues in a few plays that mob rule leads to lawlessness. In a similar defusing-the-mob scene in Coriolanus, he even reuses the line "would feed on one another". Okay, so let's skip the next bit, which has More cite the divine right of monarchy (the king is "a god on earth") and reiterate that riot --> Hobbesian anarchy. In a fit of chutzpah, More even recommends the mob beg for forgiveness! Then:

You'll put down strangers,
Kill them, cut their throats, possess their houses,
And lead the majesty of law in line,
To slip him like a hound.

That last 'him' refers to 'the majesty of law', which is led by a leash. More predicts the outcome, once order has been restored:

                              Say now the king
(As he is clement, if th' offender mourn)
Should so much come too short of your great trespass
As but to banish you, whither would you go?
What country, by the nature of your error,
Should give you harbor? Go you to France, or Flanders,
To any German province, to Spain or Portugal—
Nay, anywhere that not adheres to England—
Why, you must needs be strangers.


That hypothetical contains a threat: riot, as treason, is a capital offense. In a best-case scenario, the king will just banish you. More is setting up an obvious irony but he elaborates the point:


                              Would you be pleased
To find a nation of such barbarous temper,
That, breaking out in hideous violence,
Would not afford you an abode on earth,
Whet their detested knives against your throats,
Spurn you like dogs, and like as if that God
Owed not nor made not you, nor that the claimants
Were not all appropriate to your comforts,
But chartered unto them, what you think
To be thus used? This is the strangers' case;
And this your mountainish inhumanity.


More urges the crowd—the rioters but also the theater audience—to an act of sympathy, to see themselves in their victims. By denying the humanity of others, these rioters would become inhuman themselves.


Okay, so it's not a great speech, even after I've cut a dozen dull lines. It's got some good lines—the opening images are very good ("the wretched strangers" etc) and so is the "shark" verb followed by "men like ravenous fishes"—but it's strictly work-for-hire. Yet the sentiment of this speech, quite possibly from Shakespeare's own hand, is as vital as it is simple. Today we see human beings fleeing a catastrophe, and one of human making. It must not be answered with "mountainish inhumanity."

Incidentally, Sir Thomas More was revived in Nottingham, 1963, starring a young Ian McKellen. Nowadays Sir Ian trots out this speech for gay events. Here's a clip with intro; skip to 2:45 for the speech itself. I cut a few more lines than he did, so I'll include his edit beneath the link and you can follow along.



Grant them removed, and grant that this your noise
Hath chid down all the majesty of England;
Imagine that you see the wretched strangers,
Their babies at their backs and their poor luggage,
Plodding to the ports and costs for transportation,
And that you sit as kings in your desires,
Authority quite silent by your brawl,
And you in ruff of your opinions clothed;
What had you got? I'll tell you: you had taught
How insolence and strong hand should prevail,
How order should be quelled; and by this pattern
Not one of you should live an aged man,
For other ruffians, as their fancies wrought,
With self same hand, self reasons, and self right,
Would shark on you, and men like ravenous fishes
Would feed on one another.
                              O, desperate as you are,
Wash your foul minds with tears, and those same hands,
That you like rebels lift against the peace,
Lift up for peace, and your unreverent knees,
Make them your feet to kneel to be forgiven!

                              You'll put down strangers,
Kill them, cut their throats, possess their houses,
And lead the majesty of law in line,
To slip him like a hound. Say now the king
(As he is clement, if the offender mourn)
Should so much come too short of your great trespass
As but to banish you, whither would you go?
What country, by the nature of your error,
Should give you harbor? Go you to France or Flanders,
To any German province, to Spain or Portugal—
Nay, anywhere that not adheres to England—
Why, you must needs be strangers. Would you be pleased
To find a nation of such barbarous temper,
That, breaking out in hideous violence,
Would not afford you an abode on earth,
Whet their detested knives against your throats,
Spurn you like dogs, and like as if that God
Owed not nor made not you, nor that the claimants
Were not all appropriate to your comforts,
But chartered unto them, what would you think
To be thus used? This is the strangers' case;
And this your mountanish inhumanity.